Russia has issued a stern warning to France, urging that the legal proceedings against Telegram founder Pavel Durov should not be framed as political persecution. This comes in response to Durov’s recent arrest in Paris and the subsequent charges brought against him.
### Key Points:
– **Charges Against Durov**: Pavel Durov, a Russian-born entrepreneur with French citizenship, faces several serious charges in France, including failing to control extremist and illegal content on Telegram. The allegations also include refusing to share requested documents, as well as accusations related to child pornography, drug trafficking, fraud, and money laundering.
– **Kremlin’s Position**: Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, expressed concern that the case against Durov could be politically motivated. He emphasized that Russia views Durov as a Russian citizen and indicated that Russia is prepared to provide assistance in the matter. The Kremlin is closely monitoring the situation and has urged France to avoid politicizing the case.
– **Conditional Release**: Durov has been granted conditional release on a bail of five million euros. As part of the release conditions, he is required to report to a police station twice a week and remain in France.
– **French Government’s Stance**: French President Emmanuel Macron has denied any political motivation behind Durov’s arrest. The French government maintains that the charges are based on legal and regulatory issues rather than political considerations.
– **Telegram’s Significance**: Telegram, founded by Durov, is a major messaging app with a significant user base in Russia and globally. The platform has been a focal point in discussions about digital content regulation and freedom of speech.
### Summary:
The Kremlin’s reaction highlights the geopolitical tension surrounding Durov’s arrest and charges. Russia’s defense of Durov suggests broader concerns about the implications of the case for international relations and perceptions of justice. Meanwhile, French authorities continue to assert that the case is being handled through standard legal processes, without political interference.
Discussion about this post