Decries poor auditors remuneration.
Says such poor incentives can cripple holistic fight against corruption.
The Auditor General of the Federation, Mr Anthony Ayine on Tuesday decried the poor state of remuneration and incentives mapped out for auditors, while stating that it’s quite discouraging compared to that of their counterparts in other agencies in the country.
Speaking during the annual conference of the body of Federal State auditors-general in Abuja, Mr Ayine revealed that the poor incentives has a tendency to hinder progresses in the agency as such can cripple the holistic fight against corruption as some auditors might be propelled to compromise on objectivity and transparency, which is a crucial vessel to their work and ethics.
He said; “Remuneration for auditors is poor. Let me remind you that these auditors go out and examine the records of other audited entities. For these auditors, there is a risk of being tempted. It becomes very important that these auditors should be properly remunerated so that they can resist such temptations when they are tempted.
“Thank God for Mr. President who is so resolute about fighting corruption. I think our audit institutions in Nigeria must support this administration in fighting this corruption. It is also important that we address the issue of poor remuneration for the auditors which is a serious challenge.
“For example, you send auditors to Lagos and you are not able to pay them their duty tour allowance that should enable them stay in good hotels and do their work; you run the risk of these people tempted by the audited entities. To prevent and avoid that, there is need for these auditors to be given their duty tour allowances, and it is also important their remuneration is good in terms of allowances.
“For now, the audit institution in Nigeria is still tied to the civil service. In many climes, it is not like that; audit institutions are isolated from the civil service. If you compare the pay of civil audit institutions in Nigeria to other anti-corruption agencies, you will discover that it is something very discouraging. Something needs to be done in order to properly position and encourage these auditors to do their work.
“We have a poor consciousness of having a good accounting system in place, which involves proper preparation of accounting records that are capable of drawing financial statements, which could be monthly, quarterly, or yearly.
“Today, Nigeria has adopted the International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS), which has made our ministries, departments and agencies to prepare a standalone financial statement. The question we need to examine is – do we have the capacity in terms of people who are prepared to handle the stand alone financial statements? Because expectedly, it is required that you have separate audit opinion on the stand alone financial statement before the stand alone financial statements are even consolidated by the Accountant General of the federation, and a consolidated financial statement prepared which the AuGF will examine and report upon. So, the issue of capacity building is very important.”
The AUGF however urged state auditors-general to explore alternative sources of funding asides budgetary allocations. He encouraged them to engage developmental partners at the local and international levels to be able to attract the much needed donor funds for their offices.